branches

Categories

sponsor

calendar

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

misc


link me
this site is licensed under creative commons attribution-nonCommercial-noDerivs 2.5 license

Top 10 Tags

報碎

叱吒樂壇移花接木的疑似抄襲

By littleoslo ⋅ March 3, 2008 ⋅ Post a comment

不向外望，十多年的鼓勵原創結果是在樂壇這一池死水上鼓起了參考和抄襲的風氣，受眾坐井觀天，好讓各界創作部旗手趁機將井外的點子概念進口，洋為中用。

上年抄，今年又抄，說的是叱吒樂壇頒獎禮的宣傳海報。人家是CR，你就是CR2，但請別將Creative Review二世與Commercial Radio 2混淆。雜誌《Creative Review》去年七月號有Beck’s Fusions，當中的意念是將音樂與藝術兩者融合，你的就一聲唔該，東拼西湊合壁生成。貴為全港最受年輕人捧場的903，好有一個超人部隊，下次攞Reference，唔好咁懶得唔得。

延伸閱讀：

903 v.s. MTV Europe
世上最狗的行為

Print This PostTags: ,
« 追思變追究　鄧光榮憑什麼公審鄭少秋
Youtube Weekly Favorites #6 黑人演歌紅老外 »


Discussion

31 comments for “叱吒樂壇移花接木的疑似抄襲”

  1. 就連 903 台柱林狗都可以厚顏無恥地抄襲別人的作品，這個電台還有甚麼不可能？

    Posted by winter | March 3, 2008, 8:04 am

  2. 現在主理CR inhouse design department ARTROOM的電波少年是濃包一個，所以儘管年年叱吒都有”reference”, 近幾年卻一次又一次斷正。

    Posted by 小小超 | March 3, 2008, 11:05 am

  3. 都算抄足喇… 唉…

    Posted by Ric | March 3, 2008, 11:38 am

  4. I have seen that robot style before. I actually thought 903 copied Korean Artist Nam June Paik’s (1932-2006) work. Check out Nam Jun Paik’s robot here.

    As far as Jen goes, I actually thought 岳敏君 work with him on that. :shock: I guess that is not the case at all.

    Posted by George Chen | March 3, 2008, 11:39 am

  5. 都唔算抄呀！個background 都唔同！ :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

    Posted by kris | March 3, 2008, 2:31 pm

  6. 商台呢個台越來越羞家，
    以前對林海峰印象不俗，這幾年直插谷底

    商台變為低低能能靠呃靠騙的小圈子電台，
    最惡頂係旗下那個卓小姐變才女在各大報章傳媒以「professional」寫東寫西，大佬，呢個世界唔一定要professional 先可以做music/movie review/critics，但你唔好寫得差過/兒戲過業餘然後仲claim 自己做professional 哇。

    Posted by Damon | March 3, 2008, 2:53 pm

  7. 我覺得呢個”抄”尚可接受

    Posted by naruto | March 3, 2008, 7:19 pm

  8. 樓上 George Chen is great to point that out!!
    that Jan’s poster is really太過份… that’s totally copy … and 岳敏君’s style isn’t new either…
    I can’t see why he can be so popular except always introducing expensive japanese brand stuff…

    Posted by dead cat | March 3, 2008, 10:20 pm

  9. 樓上，Nam June Paik那個又扯得太遠了，而且要將Nam June Paik的work扯向這樣低手的流行文化創作也未免讓我感到心寒

    Posted by Damon | March 3, 2008, 11:24 pm

  10. Hi 我想問一下，你wp左邊那calendar plugin叫什麼名字？

    還有想問，你知不知任何可播放mp3 的 wp plugin？因為我找到的不能顯示中文或不太美。

    謝謝

    Posted by Ezscript | March 4, 2008, 2:57 am

  11. @Damon:可能我高故咗903，但今時今日流行文化同High Art 其實好close。如果唔係村上隆都唔會噤Hit – in both the Pop world and the Fine Art establishment.

    Posted by George Chen | March 4, 2008, 12:26 pm

  12. 想加一句:

    抄是ok，all creative professional do, 但抄之時要知到原作者的motivation, and why he/she did it. 之後要credit 番原作者。大胆Ｄ講:”係呵, 我好中意XYZ嘅Project… etc, etc”.

    如果有流意外國Artists D Interview, 好多時你都會見到類似嘅言論. No shame man.

    最怕最怕果Ｄ係死口唔認…認咗反已無人會理而且仲會被以為”You have damn fine taste”. :mrgreen:

    Posted by George Chen | March 4, 2008, 12:40 pm

  13. o甘你又唔 challenge 吓 Andy Warhol : ” 佢抄金寶湯呀，攪錯! 一模一樣 ! ”
    o甘你又唔 challenge 吓 Jasper Johns: ” 佢抄美國國旗呀，攪錯! 一模一樣 ! “

    Posted by EWOL | March 4, 2008, 2:17 pm

  14. 現在主理CR inhouse design department ARTROOM的電波少年是濃包一個

    Is it Tse Chu Yan??? :cool:

    Posted by Sinsin | March 4, 2008, 3:00 pm

  15. EWOL
    請不要嘗試用侮辱別人智慧的心態來侮辱自己的智慧

    Posted by Damon | March 4, 2008, 5:27 pm

  16. Ezscript，那calendar是本身有的，不是plugin。而mp3 的 wp plugin可以在　http://wp-plugins.net　看看，因為我很久沒有接觸，不清楚了。

    George Chen，Nam June Paik那個真有點太遠，我想指出概念相似也可，但風格也一樣便過分了。

    EWOL，你在說笑吧？ :shock:

    Posted by littleoslo | March 4, 2008, 5:56 pm

  17. i totally agree George, 我認為”致敬”同”抄襲”好大分別
    你陰陰濕濕抄但當係”creative” ….同專登光明正大地用人地作品element 加上自己創意擺到明係”玩野” (or 致敬), 完全係2回事wow.. :cool:

    Posted by can | March 4, 2008, 7:58 pm

  18. 以下供樓主參考：
    香港網絡大典：業界蠶蟲
    香港網絡大典：林海峰

    Posted by 人鬥賤 | March 4, 2008, 9:47 pm

  19. 碴来大家找…

    自封创意为先的叱咤903连续两年爆出叱咤颁奖礼海报抄袭事件。循着小奥的报道跳转到这份网志：香港好相似设计（welovecopy.blogspot.com 未出墙用户需自觅红杏）。“香港好相似设计”创…

    Posted by 兼听 | March 4, 2008, 9:54 pm

  20. 插句咀, 之前不止一次睇雜誌見到林海峰訪問中都有提及今次用岳敏君既作品, 包括上幾期既明週同今個月既JET (編者說該訪問於一月完成, 三月才出街), 並非如sidekick blog內所說的”參考也不認”

    Posted by 過路人 | March 4, 2008, 10:51 pm

  21. 這個沒HiPhone的過份，我尚可接受。

    Posted by uncle ray | March 4, 2008, 11:21 pm

  22. 過路人,
    謝謝你的補充! :)
    我沒有看你說的兩篇訪問, 如果林狗後來沒有再這樣說, 我也樂於見到.
    我寫文時也有說, 如果蘋果記者沒有曲解林狗的話, 林狗真的對岳敏君如此不敬, 那我覺得好有問題.
    因為我實在很不想這是事實…

    Posted by sidekick | March 5, 2008, 12:45 am

  23. sidekick,

    今期Jet中林狗說自己一向都喜歡模仿, 如第一張碟扮冼樸, 像去halloween party一樣去選個角色來扮, 而近年很喜歡岳敏君, 想扮畫中既開心人icon…林狗在明週中說今次用岳敏君既畫來做poster致敬, 因為想有個開心既感覺, 而且絕不會用該系列出product以示尊重 (大意如此, 因為家母已將該期明週掉了)

    Posted by 過路人 | March 5, 2008, 9:25 am

  24. 過路人，

    係咪補鑊呢？
    因為我相信林狗都係個會上網會留意網上聲音的人來
    兩篇文章哪個先哪個後？

    Posted by Damon | March 5, 2008, 2:11 pm

  25. 明週是阿Paul和家強透露鬧翻原因那一期, 我是因為看Beyond才買的, 那時約是一月頭至一月中吧, 而今期JET的編者說訪問是一月中進行, 但今個月才出版

    Posted by 過路人 | March 5, 2008, 4:28 pm

  26. Damon,
    在明週的網頁找到是第2044期
    2008-01-12出版, 是早過生果日報的報導一星期出街
    當中大篇幅說林狗私事, 只有一小段caption說到向岳敏君致敬, 所以看漏眼也不出奇, 只是看到網上有人說林狗從沒有提到岳敏君, 甚至說他狡辯, 我覺得這隻死貓太大隻了

    Posted by 過路人 | March 6, 2008, 1:15 pm

  27. 阿jan喺個網晨早提過岳敏君啦,仲有佢啲畫添!
    http://sharethereallife.spaces.live.com/
    (14 jun, 07)

    Posted by j | March 6, 2008, 6:27 pm

  28. 什麼樣的電台，就養出什麼樣的林樣。

    Posted by 喵爸 | March 6, 2008, 9:33 pm

  29. hello littleoslo, i happened to read ur blog and hv digged out from my conversation with a frd on 2 Jan, just a day after the 903awards.
    I was so curious about their project SKYHIGH project, and that was really a coincident, i happened to pump in some designer’s blog and find out a similar work dated earler than this project:

    http://www.my903.com/my903/skyHigh/teaser.jsp
    http://marcuswalters.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html

    I m not 100% sure if this is a coincident, or whatever.

    Posted by g | March 16, 2008, 10:18 pm

  30. g，你是不是指圖中的雲？歡迎繼續報料

    Posted by littleoslo | March 16, 2008, 11:19 pm

  31. yes! i dun doubt ideas can be alike. and god knows why i pumped into that on jan 2, 2008. they are of coz not the same but immediately map my mind to the project when i saw it on the designer’s blog. i wonder how many other designs show cloud with legs? maybe a lot.

    Posted by g | March 16, 2008, 11:24 pm

Post a comment